So it`s not the Nominee-Agreement solution. Maximizing the minority shareholder`s stake in the company is what we offer. Although our clients hold shares and hold the shares, the rights related to the shares are transferred to the party. Therefore, in this case, the adversary acts as a minority shareholder, but can obtain the maximum interest and benefits on the loans granted by the guarantees received. It must be signed by the investor and the local nominee in order to restrict the local authority of the nominee and authorize the original owner of the business In such an agreement, both the lender (seller of the business) and the borrower/nominee acknowledge and accept: that this loan agreement is a limited road loan agreement in which the lender`s rights with respect to the payment of the loan described above are limited to (i) the net guarantee that the borrower/candidate receives from the sale of all the shares or any of the shares, ii) dividends to the shares actually received by the borrower/to the appointment and (iii) to the net proceeds received by the borrower as a result of the liquidation of the business. Therefore, foreign investors can only receive a percentage of their shares within the limit of 49%. While the remaining 21% cannot initially be given to foreign investors for the existence of the DNI. To this end, we cannot propose to sign a nominated agreement, as this goes against the law. The alternative we propose is to create a slightly more complicated structure, but not just a nominated agreement. If the profits of foreign investors cannot be realized by holding shares, what is followed by foreign investors is obviously nothing but profit. The party that nominates the candidate is often designated as the beneficiary. The nominees represent the interests of the beneficiaries and, therefore, the nominees must comply with the promise and, of course, the instructions of the beneficiary when implementing specific measures. It occurred to me, and I told the IAM that if in his country the practice of the nominated agreement is not prohibited by the laws of his country, it is so that there is only one proof that the shares belong to the A.
N.A.L.A. is the letter indicating that the share belongs to the A. made according to the law in the country of origin of the WNA. But for that, you have to ask a lawyer you trust. But I am more confident and I always propose that it is good to go through official procedures, namely to change the status of the PT to PT PMA. . . .